Thursday, 19 February 2009

Well, well, well.

I accept that faith requires a certain degree of detachment from reality. If it didn't, cynicism and logic would take over and we'd all be soulless automatons. Or Mr Spock. I am differentiating between religion and faith here as while I don't subscribe to any particular religion, I do have faith. I trust that's clear. No? Oh well, what a pity, never mind.

Sometimes I hear tales that are somewhat far fetched. Often though I can see the seed that spawned the tale and see where things may have been exaggerated or poetic licence taken. A tale I read this week though just seems so far removed from any kind of reality I'm at a complete loss.

North Wales circa 630AD. A particularly attractive young girl with a reputation for possessing great intellect decides to give herself over to Christ and become a nun. The local prince thinks that would a terrible waste so goes to see her to suggest instead she become a princess. Not a bad deal you might think, and certainly Disney have made a few bob by suggesting that it's every young girls dream. Anyway, our heroine decides that rather than be a princess she'd prefer to remain chaste and live in poverty. Great intellect you see.

Unwilling to take no for an answer the young prince goes from charming suitor to potential rapist, and our heroine takes flight down the hill towards the local church where her family are attending mass. I know what you're thinking, she's planning on becoming a nun but doesn't go to mass with her family? She's not that committed is she? Anyway, being the sensible and level headed dashing young prince that he is, our villain whips out his sword and lops her head off. The head rolls down the hill and comes to rest on a slight plateau. Suddenly, water starts to spring up through the ground, bathing the head and ruining her hair do.

Our heroine's uncle, who was taking the mass she didn't bother going to, hears of his niece's fate. Again, I know what you're thinking, where some particularly chatty sheep watching that suddenly ran into the church to bleat? Someone send him a tweet on his i-phone? There's no suggestion that there were any witnesses so what alerted him remains a mystery. Having been alerted though, he and her parents leave the church and attend to the head, picking up the soggy bonce and taking it back up the hill to where the body lay, placing it back on the neck and covering it with a cloak. You'd think at this point that seeing their murdered daughter lying on the side of the hill sans head there'd be some form of outpouring of sorrow. A desire to apprehend the murderer. Pay last respects. No, they all went back to the church to finish mass and possibly tea and biscuits. Maybe a flan.

With mass over, the family head back out to the body and the uncle kneels beside her, bearing his soul in prayer. Personally I imagine this bit to be like Britain's Got Talent with the holy trinity hovering over their buzzers while watching. The uncle, managing to complete his prayer without a single “X” wins a holiday home in Bangor and his niece resurrected. Yes, when he removes the cloak the head has been reattached and our heroine is fine and dandy. I wonder if he thought to say “Ta-da!” as he pulled the cloak away, and I hope he got a round of applause. Again though my imagination runs away with me a bit because the picture I can't get out of my head is that of Patty Mullen in Frankenhooker. Not exactly saintly.

Now obviously I didn't pay much attention to biology classes as I really would have expected decapitation to be terminal and so anyone having been dead, and we're not talking slight misunderstanding with finding a pulse here, to then be up and about at the very least would have been accused of being a witch, with the village gathered and set to collecting kindling. And if not a witch then what? You're dead but now you're walking about. That would make you a zombie? Surely? Again, villagers, kindling, marshmallows.

Attention now turns to our villain. Maybe it's just me, but if I'd just decapitated someone on a Welsh hillside I think my immediate reaction would not be to hang about. I think at the very least I would leave the area, possibly burn my clothes, but definitely not put my sword into the ground and lean on it. So what does our villain do? He puts his sword in the ground and leans on it while the family come out, collect the head, put it by the body, cover with the cloak, return to the church, finish mass, come back out, pray, and finally remove the cloak (ta-da, round of applause, bow to circle, bow to the stalls). I'm sure he did regret this somewhat odd decision as once our heroine was breathing again, her uncle called forth the wrath of God and the ground opened and took the prince away, presumably to the bowels of Hell. Bit excessive if you ask me, given that even decapitation didn't appear to cause any real harm in the end. I think had he gone to the court of appeal he'd have had a case.

Resurrected and by all accounts ecstatic at being able to breath again, our heroine spends the next twenty two years of her un-death as a recluse, until Jesus himself appeared to tell her that her un-death would soon be reclassified to re-death.

The site where her decapitated head came to rest and the spring appeared is now a place of pilgrimage for people to bathe in the waters, preying 3 times to be cured. Much like the way you'd call Beetlejuice, with just as likely an outcome.

Go to St Winefride's Well, Holywell and see for yourself.


Monday, 16 February 2009

At Home with The Dentons - Episode Three:

The Dentons Reloaded


Paul: Hi JC.
JC: Oh, erm, Hi Paul. Didn't hear you come in.
Paul: I thought that with you and Helios being so tight you'd have known I was coming in.
JC: Well yes, obviously, I was just, erm, distracted.
Paul: With what?
JC: Oh y'know, ensuring global stability, making sure environmental conditions in Newcastle, New South Wales are varied enough to annoy Professor Franks. The usual.
Paul: And you normally do that with your pants down?
JC: Yes.
Paul: Hmm.

Friday, 13 February 2009

Aisle be there

Standing by the pastas in the supermarket today I became very self aware. I'm not a thin man, but I'm hardly gargantuan either. My waste is more rounded than perhaps I'd like, and yes my rear end can comfortably fill a Victorian armchair. Standing on the bathroom scales would suggest I'm obese, though it's marginal and I am working on it. The point is, no matter how much you shunt, push and grunt, that shopping trolley is not going to fit up my arse.

Thursday, 12 February 2009

At Home with The Dentons - Episode Two:

The Two Dentons


Paul: Hi JC.
JC: Hey Paul.
Paul: Doing much?
JC: Just making it rain on the Isle of Man.
Paul: Why?
JC: To make it wet.
Paul: Oh. I'm going the pub, coming?
JC: No.

Wednesday, 11 February 2009

Taking stock.

Fool that I am, when I started this blog thing I didn't see the point in adding tags or labels to the posts. I never considered having to go back through to see what I'd thought about 'x' at the time (y?). So I'm off on a Who-esque journey to the past and into my growing back catalogue so that I can now, well, catalogue it. Assuming it doesn't take too long I should be back yesterday.

Saturday, 7 February 2009

At Home with The Dentons - Episode One:

The Phantom Premise

Paul: Hi JC.
JC: 'sup?
Paul: It's all good. Watcha up to?
JC: Oh, y'know, general omnipotence
Paul: JC, you, like, know everything right?
JC: Yeh.
Paul: So what's the new Watchmen movie like then?
JC: Oh man, it's sweet.
Paul: Cool, wanna go see it with me?
JC: No.
Paul: Oh.

Friday, 6 February 2009

Alive alive d'oh!

I don't like criticising. Honest. Sure I like to point fun as much as the next socially inept intellectual failure, but that's different. It's hard for me to justify anger sometimes as those my anger would be directed towards are far and away on a higher tier. Take my current bile inducing situation, the bastion of all that is unholy, Games For Windows Live. Those responsible for it are well education suitably qualified professionals and were we to meet I can see it going something like this:

Me: Games For Windows Live is shit!

GFWL Team: Could you do better?

Me: Erm, no.

Argument lost and I'd slope off home with my stomach acid reaching tonsil tickling levels, develop massive stomach ulcers and drop dead. Probably best I don't pop over to Redmond then.

The thing is though, the statement stands because as far as a user experience is concerned, Games For Windows Live wholly fails to deliver on it's premise of providing seamless interaction between itself, the user and the game. I've seen numerous rants about GFWL and I've always thought they were a little harsh, however I now find myself a fully paid up hater. My first experience of GFWL was, like many others, with Gears Of War (PC). A competent 3rd person shooter that by the end I was playing simply to finish and complete the story rather than any real desire to keep playing. When every now and then a little achievement box appeared it was fine, I wasn't particularly interested in the achievements, they're not something that I have any drive to collect. I kind of regard them like the Panini football stickers. I collected them as a kid and if I was still ogling pictures of Sam Fox and listening to Adam & The Ants I'm sure I'd want to collect them now, but I play games for entertainment and any sense of competition or need to collect artificial trinkets has long since left my old and weary frame. So why do I now hate GFWL? Fallout 3 (PC) is why. Fallout 3, a little slice of gaming heaven. I've been lost in the wastelands of post apocalyptic Washington DC for weeks and I have loved every second of it. Most of the time I've resisted using the fast travel system to move between discovered locations because I am feeling that lone man in the wilderness vibe, and that includes the trek and any pitfalls it may encompass. It was a little irritating therefore to have achievement boxes popping up periodically as while it's okay for a shooter, Fallout 3 is an RPG at heart and those moments break the bond between me and the environment I had completely given myself over to. Not to worry though, at the end of the day that's what the developers decided to do and as everything else they've done is right I can accept their decision for the achievements too. So why my sudden allegiance to the “GFWL must be destroyed” brigade? For that we must journey back to a time of innocence. When men fought great beasts to secure their family's food and shelter, about 8 weeks ago. I had a problem following a Windows update that left me unable to update further. Remote connection from a Microsoft tech' bod resulted in him telling me is was basically screwed and to reinstall the OS. My PC is used for a multitude of sins only one of which is gaming and at that time I had numerous personal projects on the go and so wasn't in a position to wipe it all there and then. So while I'm finishing my bits off I'm playing Fallout 3. Fallout 3 being a GFWL game wants me to log in to GFWL when I play, but GFWL has an update it wants installed but with all my update features AWOL and no way to replace them without a reinstall of the OS it can't, so it logs me out but still used the GFWL account details for my save games. That's fine, I have no problem with it so far. Over the past couple of days, I've finished all the previous odds and sods I was doing, I've backed up everything of any remote significance and I've formatted and reinstalled my OS, with the obligatory 24 hours of then getting all the hotfixes, service pack and more hotfixes. Reinstalled Steam and all my Steam games, and reinstalled Fallout 3 and copied over my save games. Why then, when I launch the game can I not access my previous saves? Why does it want me to create an offline account in order for me to continue my game? A bit of Googleing later and it appears the fix it to download the GFWL client separately and install it and sure enough a reboot later and all seems well. Indeed the new interface is not wholly unpleasant and it looks like Microsoft may be finally learning from Valve's example and Steam, except ,where are all these immersion breaking achievements I've collected while wandering the wastes? It would appear that because I wasn't connected to the GFWL service when those achievements were unlocked, they aren't saved or credited. They are lost. Gone. Vanquished. I have to ask then, why have them in the first place? If achievements in an offline game have no value, what is their point? Surely the unlocking of the achievements would be part of the save game and on connecting to the GFWL service the appropriate records updated? Is that so hard?

Like I said, I'm not an achievement seeker in games and I have no great desire to see and collect them all, however, having forced them upon me and in the process breaking, all be it fleetingly, my immersion, to now simply cast them aside is as insulting as it is careless. I hate you Games for Windows Live. You made me want achievements.